A long, long time ago, I sent in an entry to the Socknitters Museum of Odd Socks.  In it I detailed the tragedy of losing one of the first fingering weight yarn socks I ever knit - an eye-popping mustard yellow thing, with toe, heel, and ankle stripe in a tweedy red left-over.  That must have been back in the summer of '96, just after I moved to my last house, and (coincidentally) just after the sock bug bit me.

In all that time my missing sock never turned up.  Although I was sure it would reappear behind a bureau or under the washing machine, I didn't find it when we moved out, although we left the old house broom clean and bare to the walls.  I came within a hairs' breadth of tossing the mate to my missing sock when I divested myself of others during The Great Sock Exorcism.  At last minute though, I took my mustardy friend out of the toss-me pile and tucked it back into my sock drawer as a reminder of life's eternal mysteries.

Yesterday I got an envelope in the mail.  It contained the missing sock. 

No note.  No return address.  The postmark was local, but not in town.  My guess is that the new owners of my old house found it - where I haven't a clue - and knowing I probably missed it, mailed it to me.  Either that or the colorblind poltergeist finally had enough of the thing and decided to send it home.

I'm a sucker for an interesting knitting article.  Sadly all too few magazines are providing them. Vogue used to have them.  Knitters, too.  Of late both have skewed to intro-level stuff, or mindless rah-rah pieces.  Interweave Knits started out hosting articles, but has changed to more of a pattern focus of late.  Threads used to have fabulous articles, but they abandoned handwork in all its forms, including knitting.  Piecework has an occasional interesting bit, but not at the depth or breadth of what Threads used to do.  Family Circle/Easy Knitting is deady dull and aimed at someone else.  Who I'm not quite sure because it's too dowdy for younger beginning knitters, yet too simple in style and execution for other age groups.   Even the patterns in most knitting pubs of late have left me yawning.  So it was with extreme skepticism that I picked up the Fall '04 edition of Inknitters.  Oh boy.  Another mag to leaf through and not buy.

What a surprise!  I will say that I didn't much care for the adult sweater patterns in the issue.  There are lots of them and most are o.k.  but none grabbed me with that gotta-knit urge.   But that's fine because what sucked me in and kept me flipping pages were the articles.  Articles for thinking knitters!  Lots of articles!

To start off, there's Lucy Neatby on her special magic buttonhole for double thick button bands.  This stellar technique is pretzel clever and makes me want to design up a cardigan just so I can try it out.  Lucy's Tradewind Knitwear even published this trick as a separate broadside pattern sheet.  And here it is in this issue, elaborated upon at length and described in depth far beyond even what the pattern sheet offers.  This one technique alone is worth the price of the entire magazine. 

Then there's an in-depth article by Joan Schrouder (aka the KnitList's St. Joan) on steeking, especially for curved and angled areas.  Again, just one article that justifies the entire purchase cost of this issue.  Going on, there's an excellent article on finishing tecniques by Jaya Srikrishnan, detailing various no-sew techniques that can be used in various forms of finishing (i.e., picking up stitches, three-needle bind off). 

More!  There's an article on cross-pollination among needle arts - using knitted fabrics as a basis for further sewing and embellishment.  I may not like all the things that are presented as examples, but the thought of combining skills/crafts is a heady concept ignored by every other single-focus publication.    There's an article on adapting standard computer spreadsheet programs to track pattern progress, calculate rates of increase/decrease, and to produce knitting pattern charts. 

Wait!  More!!  There are articles on short rows, and their use in directional knitting; on troubleshooting common mistakes and how to fix them; on designing collars of various types; on inserted seam pockets; and something about knitting machines which I admit I didn't read through.

I don't gush, and I don't do endorsements.  But I'm filled with enthusiasm by this rag.  I'll be subscribing and (probably) picking up all the back issues as well.   What a happy find.

No, the kids' Blues Clues videos haven't gotten to me. One of my all-time favorites is a sweater done in screaming magenta wool. I did it ages ago, back when I was a regular customer at Washington, D.C.'s late, lamented Woolgatherer in Dupont Circle.

There was a guy helping there who was fantastic. Back then I had the itch to knit, but a ramen noodle?budget. ?I'd walk in, pull my crumpled dollars and left-over laundry quarters out of my pocket and say "I want to make the most magnificent thing I can afford."? And he'd find it. Sometimes we'd find a luxe pattern and a budget yarn, pairing them against all likelihood of success. Sometimes there'd be an odd lot or strange color at an off price, and he'd spend the time to hunt down a project that could be made from that amount. On top of it all, he had fantastic color/style judgement. Not only were his recommendations fun to knit and in my price range, they were also great wardrobe additions in colors that always suited me. He's gone now - yet another AIDS victim, but I think of him fondly whenever I wear the things he helped me with, or show someone else one of the pointers he shared. Alas, I am truly ashamed to admit that for all the times I visited and all the help I received, I never learned his name.

This item is proof of his expertise. Magenta?? Who can wear something that loud?? It turns out that I can. The yarn is Brown Sheep Lambs Pride. I knit this around '86 or so from an Aarlan pattern appearing in one of their large-format magazines - possibly from that year's fall or winter issue (I haven't found the box with it yet, otherwise I'd be sure).This is?a case where cross-materials substitutions worked well. The original pattern was done in a linen/silk combo. The?yarn?was a very expensive yarn that would have cost me easily five times what the Lambs Pride did. I would never have thought of so drastic a departure back then.The gauges however matched, the wool showcased the texture stitches brilliantly, and the piece just clicked together with no problems whatsoever.

There are several details on it that I'd like to point out. First, note the ribbing. Remember how I said I always liked twisted stitches?? This is the piece that started it. The ribbing is done in P2, K1tbl. That's what makes the nice, crisp, widely spaced verticals. The color on the detail shot below is closer to real life, although it's a bit lighter than the original.

The body is entirely knit in a variant of Wide Waffle (Walker II, p. 152). That's a stitch formed from a zillion twisted stitches (1x1 cables) plus YO eyelets. Although the pattern was fussy, it was quick to memorize and being on large needles (#9s) was fun and quick to knit. I especially like the contrast of the heavily diagonal, textured?body and the wide bits of crisp ribbing.

The neckline was also done in an unusual manner that was very common on Aarlan pattens of the time. The back of the piece is bound off straight across, with no shaping or edging whatsoever. The front is worked leaving a very wide Vee. Two strips of ribbing are worked as separate pieces (with slip stitch selvedges for neatness, since they show), and are then sewn on to the edges of the Vee, overlapping at the bottom point. It's an unconventional treatment, and one I was afraid would pose problems of durability, but as you can see - this sweater is still going strong almost 20 years later.

Again, the moral of the story:? if you want your pieces to last, use the best quality materials you can afford; and you can't go wrong with real wool. That and AIDS has claimed so many of our best and brightest. We miss them all.

I found a box of stuff I've?been carting around forever. (At least it seems like forever). In it were mouldering reminders of decades past. Including this little doodle sampler I did to hang on my dorm wall:

From the stitching standpoint, I can say it's unremarkable - cross stitch and crewel type stitches, done on muslin ground in standard-issue DMC floss. There's a bit of couched silk ribbon, too. The turquoise ribbon has faded, leaving only the little turquoise fastening stitches, and the bits of matching color cotton down below. It's signed "KEB '74."

As to the sentiment. Like the title says. It was the '70s.

I?stitched it up?over a weekend and had it on the wall by Monday. I think I did it mostly to annoy my first roommate: a gal who managed to arrive at college with calcified attitudes, white kid gloves, and a life-long desire to take two years of college at the most to?find a husband and then drop out. She did manage to do just that and start a family, although not necessarily in the order she would have preferred. I guess she never quite took the sampler seriously...

More on Sontags

My friend Kathryn the costume doyenne, tells me that?the original?sontag isn't really exactly like a poncho. Sort of, but not quite. It's more like a scarf or fichu meant to cover the front of the upper torso that fastened behind the neck. They were usually buttoned or tied in the back. The idea was to avoid shawl points or dangling ends that could pose a danger in the era of open fires. Think of "Gone with the Wind" costumes, with the long shawl-like thing criss-crossed over the front of the body, with the ends tied behind the waist.

That makes sense. Looking at the item in the page from the NYPL it may be pictured from the back. The wearer would be facing away from the viewer, and the spot where the two sides meet would be at the lower back. It still looks like?a capelet/shawl hybrid to me, but worn backwards from the way that seems logical today.

When I was starting on Dragon you may remember me moaning about how difficult it was to find teeny-size steel crochet hooks. Yes, I know they're available on line from specialty dealers, but I don't like to place small orders for things I need yesterday.

Today I found some. I?stumbled into a local store and into another era: Balich's 5 & 10, 1314 Massachusetts Avenue, Arlington, MA 02476. If you were a kid in an Eastern US?city during the '50s or '60s you'll remember stores like this -? frowzy, little, local everything-stores that aspired to be a Woolworth's but were too tired to dust or take inventory. I remember them on Avenue U in Brooklyn, NY; in the Bronx, NY and in Teaneck and Hackensack, NJ. Friends have described them to me in Philadelphia, PA, Providence, RI, too. Think? of a narrow avenue storefront, with merchandise on wooden raised-rim tables, with overflowing shelves above and bins below. Think of retail chaos, wood floors, dusty stained tin ceilings, insufficient lighting, window glass mostly obscured by advertising posters.

This shop fits the description spot on. Central casting couldn't have dredged up a place so perfectly frozen in time. It's dim,?the three aisles are just barely squeeze through size, and oddments hang from every available surface.Balichs stocks?everything from bra size expanders and?pink plastic curlers,?to cast iron skillets, Red Heart yarn, squirt guns (remember ray-gun shaped squirt guns?),?screwdrivers and pencil sharpeners. O.K., so there were Sponge Bob toys there among the pick-up sticks and checkers sets, but the spirit of the place hadn't budged a bit since '62.

While the yarn offerings?were surprising (that they existed at all) and disappointing,?I was bowled over that they?carried three lines of crochet threads down to size 20, plus a full range of Boye knitting/crochet accessories and aluminum knitting needles. They also had a dusty display of steel crochet hooks down to size #14. I bought the last one of every size below #11 (1.0mm down to .75mm).

I also found a thing I knew from childhood, now need desperately, but couldn't find anywhere else. We've got a rather aggressive gas stove in the new house. While it flames up nicely to boil? water and saute with speed, it's impossible to turn it low enough to do a gentle heat. As a kid I'd heard these called "simmer guards" or "flame tamers."? Now for the princely investment of $2.45, I've got one, too. I'll be trying it out tonight and will report back on how well it works.

Here's a picture of?Balich's on the rather irreverant blog of some local teen who appears to be terminally bored with life in this burg. As a fellow high school humor magazine refugee, I wipe away tears of laughter, and say "Buck up, kid. It's not as bad as Teaneck, NJ. 30 years from now you'll be nostalgic for a decent crummy 5 & 10, too!"

So if you've got a need for a whatzis that big box stores just won't meet, look around under local rocks to see if you've still got a store like this hanging on somewhere. Then subsidize history by buying something there.

Without? knowing it, apparently my post of yesterday that mentioned on-line access to eBooks through the Boston Public Library exposed a security hole in their system. It's plugged now, so that only library card holders registered with the BPL can access the eBooks system.

I can imagine it right now - "Oh my goodness, Quincy!? We're being overrun by a mob of book-crazed knitters!"? "Batten down the hatches, Sam!? We're leaking access bytes right and left!"

Oh well. At least our stampede helped them solve an oversight?that might have developed into a more serious problem.

I'm still plugging away. Here you see the finished top border and the start of the border on the bottom:

I think the framing contrasts are working nicely. At the current rate of production, I hope to have this puppy finished in two weeks. Three weeks, tops.

In other projects, a couple of people have asked what happened to the things I was working on when Dragon Fever hit. I'd been doing an entrelac project, and a raglan in a self striper. The answer is both are AWOL. I started Dragon just before our July 4th vacation, about two weeks before we moved to the new house. The bag with those projects in it was packed as part of the general relocation. I know that box is somewhere in the new house, but I haven't found it yet. To be fair, we've got upwards of 30 boxes as yet to be unpacked. Most are books, waiting patiently until we can get bookcases.

The rest are miscellaneous and/or poorly marked boxes each?containing a grab-bag of whatever. Most of those are destined for storage in the under-eaves box rooms behind our closets, but we can't move them there until after the roof is redone. We're now playing the hurry up and wait game with the roofer. So the boxes (including the Mystery Box with my knitting projects in it) are sitting in out of the way corners, waiting for the post-roofing reassortment of storage.

Ahhh. The joys of moving!

I can't help kvelling. The kidlets have attacked knitting!? They started at the Boston Knit-Out two weekends ago, and are still going strong. As anyone with children can tell you, that's an eternity in the attention span of a six-year old.

Here we see the two of them. The older one is wearing her frist scarf and working hard on the second. The?little one is wearing her first product - ?an earwarmer band. Somehow, even afternoon TV doesn't seem so evil if they knit during the cartoons.

What's next for them?? Whatever they want to do (within reason of course). The older one is leaning towards a fulled/felted bag. The little one wants to make a felted chainge purse. I've got lots of rustic Maine-style wool in my stash, perfect for fulling. If they stick?with it, sooner or later their products will show up here.

Grrr.

As of yesterday, I'd finished the top edging, run the solid two-row strip down the left hand side, chained out to establish the bottom edge, and was three rows into the charted part of the remaining border strip.

Today I had to rip out everything done after Saturday. I had made the only absolutely fatal error there is on this piece. I forgot to work the last double-width eyelet hole on the top edge, so there was no way of putting the last inch of my curtain onto its curtain rod.

As of today I've finished the ripping back, have created the missing hanging hole, and am in the forever bands of solid double crochet at the leftmost edge. As a result I don't have the nifty-looking progress shot I'd hoped to share today. Instead, in response to some requests for a closer look at the join between the old and new work (and provided my photog skills cooperate), I present a detail shot of the edging join area:

Remember - you're looking at the piece sideways compared to the working direction. (Also as it turns out, from the wrong side, but that doesn't matter). My working direction proceeds from the right edge of the photo to the left edge. There's a schematic of the stitch logic for this join in a previous post.

One thing that may or may not be seen in the resolution-stripped photo above - the J&P Coats Royale brand name size 30 cotton thread I'm using has a nice sheen to it compared to most crochet cottons. I have to say I really like the stuff. It does appear to have limited distribution though. Even the Coats website doesn't? list it. So far the only retailer I've found that mentions Royale crochet cottons?is the big-box crafts store, Michaels, and I'm loathe to shop there on principle, much preferring to patronize smaller needlework specialty shops.