Thursday, November 11, 2004

From my inbox, based on yesterday's post:? Does knitting really need to be blocked?? It seems so inconvenient to take all these finishing steps when we all want to get the current piece (finally)?done, try it on, and cast on for the next.

It's?up to you. I find that while blocking is far from an absolute remedy for all knitting ills, it does even out stitch imperfections, improve drape, and even does a little bit to help tame curl. I do a wash/wet block, in which I wash the garment as I intend to for the rest of its life, then pin it out to dry. I never use any of the steam blocking/finishing methods. You can set yarn for life using steam, a mistake is yours forever. But wash/wet blocking can be undone by another trip through the laundry.

I don't block everything I knit, but I almost always block wool or wool-blend things larger than socks. I also almost always block things I intend on sewing together. If I've knit in the round, I'll block the body and sleeves before attaching them. If the sleeves go on early (like on a Wallaby, where they are joined before the yoke is knit I'll block the sleeves first, attach them, then block the entire garment when again when all the knitting is done.

I always block lace and cotton knitting - especially counterpane motifs before assembly. Yesterday's poncho looked MUCH better after it was stretched to even out and maximize the spread of the laddering.

I rarely block hats unless they require post-knitting shaping (like stretching a tam over a plate to give it a beret fold). Some synthetics I block, others not. I didn't block my Suede T because it was heavy enough to lay flat without encouragement, plus I'd heard that immersion in water changes the yarn's drape. (I'll probably dry clean that piece). I did block the Waterspun poncho. Classic Elite Waterspun?is a yarn that looks worlds better after washing and blocking. I've made several things from it and always block it before assembly.

So. Do I always block?? No. Do I think blocking is worth the effort?? For most, but not all pieces.

Thursday, November 11, 2004 12:00:00 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
Wednesday, November 10, 2004

Is now blocked out, stitched together and is being edged. Here's a photo mid-block:

I've pinned out both rectangles one on top of the other, using the same set of blocking wires in an attempt to ensure that they end up being the same size. You can see the lacy ribbed look resulting from the dropped stitch pattern, plus the variegated ended up doing a little zig-zag flash thing on some of the stripes.

The two pieces are now dry and sewn together. I've started crocheting around the neck edge for firmness. Since I did a chain selvedge, I'll use that to my advantage around the neck. By doing one or two more double crochets than would fit flat over each chain selvedge loop, I'll end up with a firm, scalloped neck trim, possibly with some picots thrown in. Pix tomorrow.

Birds Eye Shawl

In other knitting related news, I've started the Birds Eye Shawl available as a free pattern on the Heirloom Knitting website. I'm using Lorna's Laces Helen's Lace in mixed berry colors - mostly purples with some blue and fuschia thrown in. I'm not entirely pleased at the effect because the colors are overwhelming the texture pattern. I might make some mods to the pattern. I've gotten about eight inches into the thing. I may keep the birds eye pattern up around the edge of the piece, but switch to a plain garter stitch or stockinette center, possibly with a line of the birds eye ring motifs running up the center like a spine. More thinking is in order...

Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:00:00 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
Thursday, November 04, 2004

Today we go up and downscale. First Rowan, then Spinrite/Bernat. Both do?a membership thing, but each does it differently.

Rowan

Rowan, like Karabella sells fashion. However Rowan unlike Karabella?retails its products via the website, and as a retailer provides more end-user consumer information. Full yarn?data is available, including stitch and row gauge, recommended needle size, color cards,?and complete wash instructions. There is also search capability, and visitors can look up yarns by name or specify gauges, weight names, or fiber types (searching combos of attributes isn't possible though).

The site also sells the various Rowan publications, including books, magazines, and in some cases - individual patterns abstracted from them. You can page through the contents of the larger publications, and links are provided to the yarns from which the individual designs are knit (in some cases just the yarn name is given without making it an active link). One?annoying info lack is that thumbnails of the patterns don't display yarn quantities. If one was to buy off the website, choosing patterns and yarn one wouldn't know how much yarn to order to make something in the desired size. Another annoying info gap - like most sites that are selling image, there is nothing on the Rowan site that describes garment?sizes or mentions the range of sizes in which the patterns are offered.

Other products/services at the site include a line of designer fabrics, notifications of and registration for upcoming workshops in the UK, and a limited number of kits.The site does offer up pattern and book errata (called addendums and placed under the "Info Centre" tab).Issue #33, Spring/Summer '03 is the?most recent magazine for which corrections are on the website (#36 is the current issue). There's also an international index of stockists (shops that carry the Rowan line). There's also a list of suggested substitutions, listing discontinued Rowan products and recommended current products that may be suitable. It's not immediately evident because it's not listed separately, instead it's in the FAQ.If you want to get in touch with Rowan, there's?contact form, ground address and telephone numbers provided, along with a note that enquires can take 7-10 business days before response.

All site services are available to both registered and unregistered site users, with the exception of the direct sales section, and the members discussion forums. On site registration shouldn't be confused with membership in Rowan International, which is a for-fee subscription that includes two magazines and other benefits. Only RI members can access the discussion boards and monthly free pattern. I can't comment on either as I don't feel like spending $44.00 US per year to find out more.

As a whole on the site, organization is good and navigation is pretty straightforward. Responsiveness varies, and there appear to be some programming errors in the books section (conflicting tab menus replace each other and loading is slow). Cross links are provided from the patterns back to the yarns, but no links go from the yarns back to the designs. If you're in love with a particular yarn and visit its page first, you'll have to poke through to find patterns that use it. Also only six color samples present themselves per page. The link to get to the next set is at the lower right, and is placed (confusingly) after the "make new search" button. You can tell that there was concern about this on behalf of the web designers because they place a prominent "we've got X shades of this yarn" statement at the top of every yarn's basic data page to remind visitors that they are seeing only a few of the available colors. Similar unclear paging haunts the pattern library, and the total number of available selections is listed at the top of pattern search results pages, too.

I do however wonder about the relationships between Rowan, R2 and Jaeger. Rowan has taken pains to establish and/or maintain those lines as separate image entities, yet they include books and designs (but not yarns) from them in the retail section and pattern search sections. It seems a strangely??schizophrenic treatment - either make them totally separate, or bring all three together under one umbrella.

On the basis of easy navigation, clear site organization, complete yarn info, good pattern browsing ability, the availability of errata and substitutions, minus points for yarn quantities and available sizes?missing from the pattern blurbs (with the paid members only thing being a business model thing that's not to my taste, but has no impact on my scoring)?Rowan gets an?A-.

Spinrite Bernat

From the heights of Rowan we come back down the mountain to the more mass-market Bernat, now a quivering vassal of the Spinrite family of yarns. Bernat sells craft, not fashion. Yes, they have patterns to make fashion garments, but the entire tenor of the site is "what?things you?can make" not "what looks you can create."? There is a difference...

Bernat's website also has a registration feature, but Bernat doesn't have the second tier paid membership, nor does it sell things directly off the site. People who sign up at the Bernat site get access to quite a few free patterns both for knit and crochet. There are also periodic newsletters sent to those who have signed up.

Bernat provides complete info on its yarns, too. Knitting stitch and row gauges and recommended needle size is there, as is suggested crochet hook size.Complete wash info is also provided, as is yardage and the useless yarn weight tag promulgated by the Craft Yarn Council (I've ranted about this before). Color samples are provided, as are links to patterns that use the yarn. There's also a link to a retailer search page that implies you can search in your local area for a particular product, however no matter what products I selected, I never got an in-state result, and only found three results for a non-product-specific list of stockists at the national level.

In addition to the free pattern library (in *.pdf Acrobat format), Bernat offers up thumbnails from current booklets offered for sale at local retailers. There are no links back to yarns from the current book profiles, although that info is provided as a link on the free pattern pages and most of the current books do state what yarn was used and what sizes are available?(no quantities though). One useful feature is?a yarn?suitability calculator that assists searches for Bernat products by by yarn descriptor, gauge, or yarn weight/yardage ratios. There is no list of older/discontinued Bernat products and their equivalents in the current line, nor is pattern errata available. There is no contact info on the site aside from a single ground mailing address.

Overall presentation is rather cluttered,?more utilitarian than groomed, but?it's not hard to make one's way around the site. I give high marks for complete yarn info and links to patterns from yarns and yarns from patterns; also for the yarn suitability tool and listing available sizes on the patterns. I take some away for the poorly working?retailers listing, the lack of info on older yarns, lack of pattern errata, lack of a convenient contact/feedback mechanism, and overall clutter.Like before, the presence or absence of a free pattern library is nice, but has no effect on these ratings. Bernat just barely squeaks into?an A-, mostly on the effort to link yarns and patterns.The addition of?historical info would?boost it to an A in spite of the clutter.

?

Thursday, November 04, 2004 12:00:00 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
Wednesday, November 03, 2004

I am too miffed at the xenophobic, fundamentalist?Red States to be very coherent this morning, so I beg your indulgence. I'll do more yarn maker site reviews when I've cooled down and can be more objective. ?Also, posting a shot of a large piece of stockinette in blue is guaranteed not to awaken those who also stayed up to watch election returns, so I'll skip a boring progress report on the blue poncho until I can show it raveled and sewn together.

Hardware

Yesterday however I did pop by the hardware store. I find it almost as much fun as a knitshop, and almost as full of Useful Knitting Gadgets. I thank The Knitting Curmudgeon for?writing about the wealth of gizmos in hardware stores back in her pre-blog days.

Yesterday's acquisition was an inexpensive caliper:

What for?? I've got lots of tiny needles, smaller than US #0 (2mm). I had hoped that it would be precise enough to parse out the difference between a 1.5mm and a 1.25mm. Unfortunately, it's not. It does help me see which sets belong together (something that can be hard to do with fingers alone), but for the tiny needles it's just not accurate enough. What it IS accurate enough for is discovering the real metric size of various needles. As we all know, just because something is marked as 3mm, it doesn't mean that the marked size is true. I know I've got "big sevens" and "small sevens". Now I know what the difference is between them.

I'll still need to shell out for a sub-zero needle gauge or micrometer, but this tool at $6.00 is still useful.

Other useful thingies in hardware stores include washers and o-rings of various sizes (stitch markers, especially for giant size needles); tool boxes and roll-up pouches for needle storage; measures of all types; the yardage?estimators used by fishermen; slabs of drywall or other soft, flat materials for blocking or pin-out boards; PVC pipe for building blocking frames for shawls and other huge flat things; lengths of thin non-rusting wire or tubes to use as blocking wires (ask for brass music wire or stainless steel welding wires); wooden dowels for create-your-own needles; and hard finish cotton twine or thin wire for knitting.

Software

This has nothing to do with knitting, but I've finally wrestled the camera into submission and can show you the Pumpkins that Ate My Sunday:

Let this be a cautionary tale. If you tell children, "We'll carve anything you want on the Jack o'Lanterns this year," be prepared for major surgery.

The wolf was a canned pattern that came with the little carving tool set, and was a special request of the smaller daughter. The dragon was an original drawing by the larger daughter.Both kids helped, but I did the bulk of the finer work. ?I can wholeheartedly recommend those carving sets. The small plastic doodads and saws really make the impossible possible, and saved me from lopping of fingers, hands, and the heads of the pumpkin requesters.

Wednesday, November 03, 2004 12:00:00 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
Tuesday, November 02, 2004

A break from the monolith of text that this blog has become.

I've been having an on-line chat with a knitter looking for something to do with a pile of small balls/many colors of worsted weight yarn salvaged from a ravelled back Intarsia sweater. I recommended the Ridged Raglan from Knitters Magazine #54,?Spring 1999 issue.

This is my 6-year old's all-time favorite sweater:

Also please excuse the blurry photo. Some days the camera and I get along, others we war. Believe it or not, this is the best of ten shots.

This pattern is by Gerdine Crawford Strong, and in my opinion is the last thing?Knitters published that was a "gotta knit it" project, and the last thing I've made from their pages. But my disappointment in their current direction is food for another day's post.

Ms. Strong's pattern is pretzel-clever. It's knit vertically, with the arm and front (or back) panel knit at the same time - decreases form the raglan lines. The "ribbing" bands at waist and cuff are actually garter stitch worked at the same time as the sweater arms/body. The idea is presented in sizes from little kid through adult XXL, and as both a pullover and as a cardigan. It calls for a worsted weight acrylic, but anything knitted to the same gauge can be used.

I hate to make more than one of anything, but I've done three of these sweaters. One was a two-blues cardigan in Encore (a mostly acrylic/wool blend); the one above is a pullover in three citrus colors of?Record 210, an Aran weight unmercerized cotton; and one was?a pullover in Tahki Cotton Classic, all in tiny balls salvaged from a five-pastel intarsia project abandoned by my mother. For the latter two I had to play a bit with the pattern to accommodate differences in gauge.

As you can see, there are tons of scope for fun with this project. It's a great vehicle for using up bits and drabs. You need one color for the purl welts that?unite the piece as a whole (in my case, navy blue, orange and white respectively), but the individual stockinette stripes can be anything, from scraps leftover from several different projects to one of those hand-dyed yarns that can be so challenging to use effectively.

My only caution is that if you do choose to use cotton take care with the cuffs. Knit an extra garter stitch ridge, and try to work them loosely otherwise they can be too tight for quick dressing. Wool and wool blends however are naturally more elastic than cotton, and don't present this problem.

If you go searching for the Knitters #54, Spring 1999, it looks like this:

A final note to US citizens - go vote or lose your right to complain for the next four years.

Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:00:00 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
Friday, October 29, 2004

For such a butt-simple project, this poncho has taken me on more twists and turns than I care to think about.  Perhaps it's knitting it for a new teen.  Perhaps it's that I find ponchos to be such boring things to make. 

Latest iteration - my choice of the texture pattern is "too heavy" in the opinion of the target wearer.  Something lighter is called for.  So I've thrown in the towel on coming up with something original, and am retreating to a freebie pattern on the 'net:  the Classic Elite Charmed Poncho.

Of course I won't be making it in the cashmere blend Charmed or all cashmere Lavish.  Prices for Charmed hover around $32. US per skein; Lavish is something like $64. US per skein.  I'd need four.  Maybe your teen deserves such spoiling, but it's not going to happen in this house.  Besides which, were I to miraculously come up with the funds, she'd expire at the thought of blowing it on yarn instead of a PlayStation game console.  

Current plans include sticking with the un-plyed blue Paternayan yarn for the thing.  She adores the colors, and being in stash - is already paid for long ago.  One other good feature of this pattern is that it's in ladder stitch (knit stockinette, deliberately unravel every 3rd stitch top to bottom).  That means that for the width it's VERY yarn-efficient.  While that's a good thing if you're knitting with $64. per skein yarn, it works out well for me, too.  The poncho as written requires only 520 yards of yarn.  It's small though - more like a ponchette.  I'll be making this one a bit wider and longer, but will still have plenty in my bag of mixed blues. 

Although my gauge is roughly 3spi, as my unplied isn't as heavy as the original yarns.  Not a problem though.  Airy works.  I'll do a multiple of 3 stitches, plus 8 edge stitches.  According to the printed gauge, the original works out to be 16 inches wide before the laddering (18 inches after unravelling).  That's an expansion factor of roughly .125 (18/16).  If I work my piece on 53 stitches (15x3 + 8), my before-ladder width should be about  17.7 inches wide (17 3/4, rounded up).  After laddering, it should be about 19.9 inches wide (20 inches, rounded up).  To keep the proportions of the original 18 wide:26 long, I need to make my rectangles about 29 inches long (26/18 = 1.44; 1.44 * 20 = 28.8) .  I'll also add two selvedge stitches which I'll slip to make sewing up and crocheting an edge easier. 

In another serendipitous occurrence, having de-plyed the yarn, I've got all this one-ply stuff that matches it exactly.

Why is this a good thing?  I note that the original poncho sports a minimal crocheted finish along the edges to stabilize the ends after laddering back.  I'll work the crochet, but I'll probaby use a simple edging pattern instead of just plain old single crochet.  Since crochet's product is thicker and bulkier than knitting given the same yarn, working the crochet out of one instead of two plies should make the edging more in proportion to the knitting than it would be if I used the whole, unsplit yarn.  This plain old stockinette piece will be ultimo boring to knit, but will be an interesting experiment to prove or disprove some of the points in my past crochet diatribes

So there you have it.  Cast on 55 stitches.  Working the first and last stitches as a slipped selvedge edge, work in stockinette until the piece is 29 inches long.  Work last purl row and finishing as described in the Classic Elite original.  Sew up, finish all edges with some simple crocheted edging to be chosen later.  I've got to save something to write about later next week, as pix of two large striped blue stockinette rectangles will put everyone to sleep.  (Even those who have made it through the math of this entry.)

Friday, October 29, 2004 1:00:00 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
Thursday, October 28, 2004

Pork in the Trees?

Well, as a somewhat pessimistic follower of Boston baseball, I had to go out and inspect the tops of the neighborhood oaks.  Surely pigs flew last night, and some might still be up there.   But on to needlework.

Not OOP Book Review - Bead Crochet

I'll break with my pattern of only reviewing long out of print books, and pick on something contemporary.  I found Bead Crochet by Bethany Barry in the library (Interweave Press, 2004). 

I have to say, I was highly disappointed.  Maybe my taste is entirely in my mouth.  I do like demonstrative jewelry and embellishment, but aside from a couple pix of historical and contemporary pieces in this book, the contents - especially the projects - left me stone cold.  

I was also extremely surprised that any book presenting a capsule history of crochet put out by Interweave can fail to cite Lis Paludan's wonderfully complete Crochet History and Technique - another Interweave Press publication.  The background of crochet given in the Beading book is vague at best, and flat out contradictory at worst.  It repeats the old nun's work saw on crochet's beginnings, and offers up a disciples-of-Christ origin for shepherd's knitting.  She mentions advanced bead crochet being taught in a Philadelphia academy in the 1820s (which seems a bit early to me based on other readings), but gives no exact citation  for it.  There are several exquisite examples of late 19th century beaded crochet in the book.  Most of these can be seen in the Amazon peek-inside preview. Unfortunately the rest of the text has nothing to do with them.

O.K., picky history criticisms aside, as this is clearly not a needlework history book.  On to the techniques and projects.  You see that large chaotic rope of beads on the cover?  All the projects inside look like that.  Large ones, small ones, square ones, pouch-style ones, flower shaped ones, ones done with eyelash yarns, and ones done with smooth yarns.  If you like the necklace on the cover and want to learn to make lots more encrusted things exactly like that, this is the book for you. 

To be fair, there is one project featuring instruction on how to crochet a basic beaded rope.  That's useful.  There are four pages of basic description for simple off-loom needle beading techniques (peyote stitch, brick stitch, square stitch, African herringbone weave) - but these things are described in passing, as adjuncts to the book's main premise - beaded crochet.

What was I expecting?  More substance, perhaps less art.  More detailed techniques, dipping into historcial sources for something besides clumps of randomly-encrusted crochet.  Maybe I wanted to see a range of things that can be done in bead crochet, and learn some techniques to make them.  While the gallery section at the back does show a wide range of pieces (some of which I do like), there is no relation between them and the techniques presented earlier.  

So to sum up - I'm glad I borrowed this one from the library before buying it.  As much as I like crochet and adore embellishment, I won't be adding this one to my permanent collection.

Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:00:00 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0]  | 
Wednesday, October 27, 2004

Several people have written to ask for the pattern for the teeny Red Sox sock

It's pretty much the same as the sock patterns on wiseNeedle.  If you've done a toe-up sock with a Figure-8 no-sew toe and a short rowed heel, you've got it.  I don't want to re-write the entire thing with detailed instructions here.  For that you can go to any of the sock patterns on wiseNeedle:

http://www.wiseneedle.com/knitpatterns.asp#socks

But here's an abbreviated version.  For any how-tos or further details, refer to the comparable section of any of these other sock patterns.

Teeny Red Sox Sock
(c) 2004, Kim Brody Salazar
Permission granted to link to this pattern and make socks for personal
consumption, but not to reproduce the pattern or make socks for sale
 without the author's consent

1 card Special Blauband darning yarn, bright red
1 card Special Blauband darning yarn, white
1 set of five double pointed needles in any teeny size you have, preferably #000 or smaller

Gauge:  Pretty much unimportant, although the darning yarn looks best at 12 stitches per inch or smaller.

Using the white yarn, work a figure-8 cast on starting with two needles and four loops on each needle.  Knit the first row as usual, taking care to untwist the stitches that will be mounted wrong on one of your needles.

Toe and Foot:
Row 1: k1, M1, k1. Using another dpn, k1, M1, k1. Using a third dpn, k1, M1, K1. Using the fourth dpn - K1, M1, K1. You should now have 4 live needles in your work, each with 3 stitches on it.

Row 2: Knit all stitches.

Row 3: *k1, M1, k2. K2, M1, K1* repeat.  Each needle should now have four stitches on it.  Your toe is done.

Row 4: Switch to red and continue knitting until sock measures approximately 3/4 of an inch measured from the tip of the toe.


Heel:
Determine where the bottom of your foot will be.  With white yarn, work the following on the two needles that hold the stitches for the bottom of the foot.  Think of the two needles that hold those stitches as being one unit:
Row 1 of decrease: K7, yf, slip next stitch purlwise onto right needle. Turn work.

Row 2: Yf (wrapping the yarn around the slipped stitch that was just slipped and return it to the right hand needle - it should look like it has been lassoed by a noose), p6, slip the next stitch purlwise (keeping the yarn in front of the work). Turn work.

Row 3: Yf (wrapping the yarn around the stitch you just slipped and returning it to the right hand needle), K5, yf, slip the next stitch knitwise onto the right needle. Turn work.

Row 4: Yf (wrapping the yarn around the stitch you just slipped and returning it to the right hand needle), p4, slip the next stitch purlwise (keeping the yarn in front of the work). Turn work.

Row 5 (first increase row :) K4, knit the next stitch through the back along with the wrapped loop around its base. (I do this by picking up the loop on the point of my right hand needle, then knitting the loop and the stitch together), yf, slip next stitch knitwise onto the right needle. Turn work.

Row 6: Yf, (wrapping the yarn around the slipped stitch so that there are now TWO wraps at its base and returning it to the other needle), p5, purl the next stitch along with the loop wrapped around its base, slip next stitch purlwise (keeping the yarn in the front of the work). Turn work.

Row 7: Yf (wrapping the yarn around the base of the slipped stitch and returning it to the other needle), k6, knit the next stitch through the back of the loop along with the two loops wrapped around its base, yf, slip next stitch knitwise onto right needle, DO NOT TURN WORK.

Ankle and Ribbing:

Switch back to red, and continue knitting entirely around the ankle of the sock.  On the first row of the ankle when you get around to the white stitch at the right hand edge of the heel, knit it along with the wraps around its base.  Continue to work in stockinette until it is approximately 3/4 of an inch measured from the top of the heel

Ribbing Row 1:  *K1 red, K1 white* repeat

Ribbing Row 2 and 3: *K1 red, P1 white* repeat

Bind off all stitches using red.  Darn in ends.

Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:00:00 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Comments [0]  |