Where are all you people coming from? Not literally, of course, but I have been wondering of late.

Blog City has introduced new statistics tools. Among the other things it does is maintain a list of the top read blog pages since the feature came on line. The list is pretty much what I expected. The poncho write-up is my most popular, fueled in part by the fact that the link has been widely collected by people maintaining pattern indexing sites. My Stupid Stitch Marker Tricks piece and the one on double-edged I-cord strips has also been in mailing list and other blogs' discussions of late - no surprise there. Make your own stitch holders also has had lots of traffic, as had the column on the history of the Kitchener Stitch name.

In fact, all the bits I've marked as "Reference" both on the right hand margin, and in the categories index are things I expect to see visited often. Reference pieces are bits I think might be more broadly useful than the rest of the drivel I usually post. But there are also some surprises on the list.

The piece I did on the baby booties has had a huge readership, with most of the hits coming from Japanese websites. My guess is that the step by step photos have helped Japanese knitters who were struggling with the English instructions. Another page that has had a phenomenal number of hits (almost all of them occurring in the last 10 days) has been the More Knitting Fun piece. That one I just don't understand. I can't find any referrers to it, and the write-up itself is rather plain. It's just an all-prose report on stumbling across a remarkable knitted object - a knit-covered bicycle. Yet in the past week or so it has had over 2,000 visitors. That's more than double the number who looked at the poncho page in the same period.

Go figure...

Of course, the Referring Web Pages tool that shows up on each page of the site should be giving me a clue. I do know from that roughly where people are hopping in from, at least for some of the pages. Thanks go to QueerJoe, the first blogger to send traffic my way; Curmudgeon Marilyn, who's prickly writings I enjoyed for a long time, and whom I've not yet managed to annoy; to Wendy, crossroads of the blogworld; and to all the other leaping off spots that launch people in this general direction.

As you can see, I'm making slow progress on my counterpane.



Athough you can't read the tape measure, one meta-unit unblocked measures around 15.5 inches across.

I've started the second motif, and done the hex,? half of its squares, and one triangle. Here I've lined up the two as I intend to sew them together. I will need a fourth motif when I finally get enough done. It will probably be a solid stockinette triangle, to go in this spot:



Either that or I need to engineer something with lines of YOs that match up with those on the bordering squares.

I did spend quite a bit of time trying to make a triangle knit from the tip down that is as close as possible to the one I've got that's knit from the base up. So far no dice. I just can't get a congruent pattern on the rows that use YOs and double decreases in the original. My triangles end up being rather rotund, and I lose the lacy openness of my original. Plus the nifty lines formed by the YOs are shifted somewhat, and no longer align with the squares when all is to be sewn together. My counterpane will have to remain assembled from lots of smaller pieces. Perhaps the next one I play with will be an honest dodecagon rather than this assembled one.

And for those who have written to say that I'm a crazed loon for trying to knit this higher complexity tesselation instead of sticking to plain old squares or hexes, you're not telling me anything new. Go play with geometry.

I'm sure others have blogged about this already - needles with built-in sensors that log the stitch count for you. There's a base station that displays the count, and appears to have holders to park the needles when they're not in use.

I can't find any confirmation that this has moved beyond prototyping into the realm of a real product, but regardless of development stage I would have some questions for the maker:

1. Are the sensors adaptable to any size needle, or is the knitter locked into using only one size?
2. What is that size, and how long are the needles?
   
3. Does it equally sense the movements of both throwers and pickers (British/American and Continental styles)?
4. How does it handle complex stitches?? For example, would it log a SSK as one stitch or three - counting the three movements it takes to produce it as separate stitches?
5. Can you dial up or down to readjust stitch count and compensate for multiple movement stitches?
6. Is there a memory function?? For example, if I sit down and knit today will it remember where I left off yesterday?
7. Is it possible to get interim counts, kind of like the way you can use trip set on a car odometer to record smaller intervals?? This might come in handy if one wanted to track a repeat in addition to tracking total stitch count.
8. Does it handle row count?? (For most knitters, row count is a far more annoying tracking problem than is stitch count).
   
9. Is there an upper limit? For example, if I work a flat piece in a tiny yarn, I could easily have a couple hundred stitches across, even on a 14-inch straight.
   
10. Does the count span rows, or is it set up to track on a single row basis?
11. How sensitive is it to spurious movements?? For example, if I bobble the needles as I reach for something or flip the work over, will that increment the count?
    

I'm not about to run out and buy something like this, even if my questions were all answered, but it's very interesting to see some creativity and technology applied to the problem.

For me, low tech is still the way to go:? my stitch marker abacus for tracking rows, and for those projects where I need to know count across at all times (very few and far between), a series of stitch markers placed every 10 or 25 stitches (or between repeats), as counted out from the center.

I have to admit that I'm no longer a big fan of wooden and bamboo needles. I liked them when I was just starting out, but as I got more miles under my fingers, I developed a serious desire for speed. These days I stick to shiny, lethal looking metal needles, and only pull out the woods and bamboos when I have to tame a particularly nasty and slippery novelty yarn. Since I detest working with those yarns, my non-metal needles are no longer part of my first bench team. Still, I do have some experiences to report. Note that elswhere on String I've got more on comparative sizes and their metric equivalents, and on comparative needle lengths for circs.

Crystal Palace

Crystal Palace markets Japanese-made bamboo needles of several types:

• Single point, 9 inches long, size US #0-19
• Single point, 12 inches long, size US#0-19
• Double points, sets of five, 8 inches long, size US#0-15
• Double points, sets of five, 6 inches long, size US#0-8
  

In general, these are smooth, nicely finished bamboo needles. The single points have rounded wooden beads on the non-business end. Tapers are a bit less pointy than metal needles. I've found the smaller sizes to be a bit less fragile than the same size needle in wood because the bamboo tends to flex and stay bent rather than bend and (eventually) snap, but even so - if you are someone who routinely finds that your metal needles sport a scimitar-like curve after use, you might find these in sizes smaller than US #3 to be too fragile for extended use.

One other word about bamboo needles in general, sometimes the tips denature a bit, especially if they get damp. When that happens the consituent fibers that make up the bamboo fuzz out a bit and begin catching on one's work. I haven't knit with enough Clovers and CPs to be able to do a comparison between the two lines, but this has happened often enough to be noticeable. A smooth down with very fine emery paper helped get rid of my tip burrs.

Takumi Clover Bamboo

Very similar to the Crystal Palace bamboos, the Takumi are smooth finish, with moderate tapers, and wooden beads on the ends of the single points. The beads are more barrel than round, but the look is very similar. They come in a wider range of lengths, but fewer diameters than CP. Current offerings on their home website include:

• Single point 13-inch long, size US#0-10.5
• Single point 14 inches long, size US#11-15
• Single point 9 inches long, size US #3-10.5
• Double point sets of four, 7 inches long, size US #0-10.5
• Double point sets of four, 16 inches long, size US #3-10.5

I also see these other sizes listed at various vendors

• Single point 16 inches long, size US #17-19
• Circualrs 16 inches long, plastic cables, sizes US#3-15
• Circulars 24 inches long, plastic cables, sizes US#3-15
• Circulars 29 inches long, plastic cables, sizes US #3-15
• Circulars, 36 inches long, plastic cables, sizes US #3-15
• Flex (Jumper needles), 20 inches long, sizes US #3-15
  

The largest difference between the Crystal Palace and Clover circulars is the nature of the join. CP uses a metal cowling into which fit both the needle end and the cable. Clover slots the cable into the butt end of the needle itself, tapering the cable so that it joins the end of the bamboo part smoothly. I can't speak to which is better because I have not used them extensively. I will say that the Clover cable seems a bit stiffer than the Crystal Palace cable.

The Clover form factor I have used quite a bit is the Flex jumper needle. Jumper needles are sort of a hybrid between circs and straights. They're used like straights, but being flexible and whippy at the end allow the weight of the work to puddle on the lap similar to circs. I have several friends who prefer straights, but because of limited hand mobility find even short straights tiresome or painful because of the leverage caused by the weight of the project on the ends of their needles. They greatly prefer jumpers to classic straights. I also liked them because I used to knit quite a bit while riding on the Washington, D.C. subway. Jumpers minimized the threat level for the rider sitting next to me. No needle ends were waving about at the edge of his/her space. (Yes, using circs flat is good for this, too.) I did have problems with my Clover tips furring, especially in the humidity of a Washington summer. Eventually I switched entirely over to metal needles, using circs in the flat rather than jumpers.

Brittany

I adore the look of Brittany needles. I've broken about a dozen over the years. Some died in the course of normal knitting. Others were in-bag or sofa-side casualties. Again, while I like the look, these aren't among the needles I reach for first.

Brittany makes several styles of needle:

• Single points, birchwood, 10 inches long, sizes US #3-17
• Single points, birchwood, 14 inches long, size US #3-17
• Double points, birchwood, sets of five, 7.5 inches long, sizes US #0-17
• Double points, birchwood, sets of five, 5 inches long, size US #0-17
• Double points, birchwood, sets of five, 10 inches long, sizes US#0-17
  

The birch single points have simple but pretty turned ends. Tapers are slightly less pointy across the line compared to bamboo needles. They also tend to be a bit more slick than bamboo, but are still nowhere near as slippery as metal. Some people who are fond of wooden needles keep a piece of nice lanolin-rich fleece or roving around, and rub their wooden needles with it after use. I'm not entirely convinced that this helps, as most of the wood and bamboo finishes used appear to be some kind of polyurethane or other plastic. I doubt the moisture can penetrate the finish, but I guess special care can't hurt.

Brittany also used to sell walnut single points with more ornate turned ends. It doesn't look like they still carry the line. I'm not surprised, as my walnut needles did tend to both dry out and break more than did my birch ones. Over the years I am responsible for the demise of about five pairs of walnut needles, ranging in size from US #10s (trodden upon) to US #5s (mashed when my knitting bag got clipped by a revolving door). I've also snapped quite a few birch single points. I took to using them for traveling back before metal needles were added to the list of allowables on US domestic flights. I must have the finger strength of a moose because I can break birch up to size US #5 clean through just by knitting with it. I do prefer these harder woods to bamboo though. They're smoother, especially at the tip, and their finish is more satiny. They're nice tools. Now if only I could learn to knit gently.

I have now survived my week from hell, managed to recuperate (somewhat); and we have returned the house to something resembling order. It's not a very close resemblance, as this family's housekeeping skill set is rather deficient, but horizontal surfaces can now be seen, laundry is no longer threatening to avalanche, and a machete is no longer needed to find the front door.

Add to that some progress on my counterpane:



As you can see, I've finished the first meta-motif, including seaming in the corner triangles. It's a bit smaller than my original estimate, but not by much. Plus it will be stretched a bit not only in the blocking, but also by the natural tension of the surrounding motifs once it is in place. One thing I'm pleased with is the lack of cupping in the center hex. Too tight blocking plus that extra seam between the bottom of the squares and the sides of the hex constrained the stretch of the thing the last time around. Working the squares directly onto live stitches around the hex appears to have eliminated that problem.

Now there's a new thing to consider. I've got a dodecagon (a twelve sided figure) here. Right now the triangle units are knit base to tip. But if I figure out a way to flip the design over, it's conceivable that I could translate the thing into a tip-out piece. AND if I can do that, it's possible for me to add those units to the squares, already worked center out, and instead of a bunch of smaller seamed pieces, produce the twelve sided meta-unit as a single piece.

Food for thought here...

How do you start the hexes?

There are quite a few ways to start off a flat knit piece done both in the round and center out. I keep gravitating back to the I-cord method. This piece is a hex, so I start by casting on a three-stitch I-cord, and working one round (I'd start off an octagon with four stitches). On the second round of the I-cord, I take my first needle and knit one, then make an increase in the space between the just worked and next stitch. If I want a more open center I'll do a YO. If I want a more solidly filled center, I'll do a make 1 lifted bar increase (a devil to do on the second round of an I-cord). Then I'll take another needle and repeat the K1, increase 1 unit. And again on a third needle. Now I have three needles in the work, each bearing two stitches, plus one in the hand to work with. At this point I flip over and begin following my pattern. For an octagon, I'd do much the same, but with a set of five instead of four needles.

Why bother with the multiple units when you can just assemble the hexes into a perfectly good counterpane?

For pretty much the same reason I make cassoulet instead of being happy with franks and beans.

How big are your motifs?? How many are you planning on making?

It's difficult to get a gauge on this stuff, but if forced, I'd say I'm getting approximately 6 stitches and 8 rows per inch over the stockinette areas. Unblocked, my center most hexes are about 10 inches across at the widest point. The squares are about 5.5 inches on a side. The bases of the triangles are also about 5.5 inches across. One entire meta-unit of hex surrounded by squares and triangles (unblocked) is about 21 inches across. I haven't measured my bed yet, but it's only a queen size. Given the vague bed linen sizes posted here and there, my counterpane should be a square or a rectangle something between 85 and 100 inches on a side. I'll need at least 4 units across and 5 units head to foot. Given my chosen layout, that's about four rows of four units, plus three rows of three units, or 28 units. That adds up to 28 hexes plus 168 squares and 168 triangles. Plus half hexes, and the smaller units needed to square out the edges somewhat (they're never going to be exactly linear), and an edging of some unknown depth. I'm not quite sure how many of the other shapes I'll need yet.

Doing the same size counterpane using only the hex units would mean making about 10 rows of 8 units, and 9 rows of 7 units - that's 142 hexes, plus edge half hexes and a border.

This project should keep me busy for a while.

There's nothing like a flurry of activity at work to make one feel appreciated. I feel very appreciated right now. My priorities being in the right place, there's been precious little knitting here since my return from vacation. I anticipate things returning to the chaos that passes for normalcy here by next week.

Even though I have no knitting or stitching goodies to share today, I can't let you wander off unrewarded. Here's another beach picture to contemplate. This one was taken last Tuesday by The Resident Male, of a beach shack perched in the dunes of the National Seashore near Provincetown, Massachusetts.

A few knitting and non-knitting related questions from the inbox:

How did Killer Bunnies go?

Tons of fun. We played as a mixed-age group, with the youngest being 7. We had hoped to get the Red Expansion Pack at Puzzle Me This in Provincetown, but they were out. We settled for Violet, the next one in sequence. The game plays more smoothly if you add them in order because each pack builds on the last, but we were able to use most of the Violet cards anyway.

What size needles did you use for the two versions of your counterpane?

The old version in the heavier cotton was knit on one of my odd size needles, it's a set of old long steel DPNs, they're probably antique 9s - and just a bit larger than standard US #4s (3.5mm), but closer to #4s than #5s (3.75mm). The new piece is knit on 3mm needles, which in some makers' lines is a US #2, and in some is somewhere between a US#2 and a US #3.

Did you finish that embroidery doodle while you were away?



Are you planning on assembling the counterpane in the same way as the last try?

No. These units can be joined in many ways. Last time I butted the triangles together. This time I plan to join squares. My goal is to do the layout shown at the upper right. Last time I used the one at the lower right. Both use some plain solid triangles in addition to the pattern bearing units.



Where did you buy the counterpane pattern?

I didn't. I made it up, starting with a standard spiraled star. I added the outline-like bars to emphasize the motif, and played with several treatments for the ground behind the star. This one like my Mountain Laurel counterpane plays with a textured ground and smooth star, but unlike that piece, plays a bit more with the ground. I also wanted to do a counterpane that was an tessellation of more interest than a flat tiled hex or a plain octagon and hex. That's why there are four units - the center hex, a patterned square, a patterned triangle, and a plain triangle. The layout above is actually an early draft showing how I played with the concept, looking at ways in which I could use the patterned units to extend the lines of the center hexes.

Can you send me the pattern?

Be patient. I plan on posting it to wiseNeedle this year - probably after I've gotten considerably more done on the thing and have a decent representation of the piece's final look. I'd also like to noodle up a complementing half hex and border.